I'm in agreement with John Hollinger's ESPN Insider article that by doing this trade "the Hornets pulled off the rare feat of saving money while becoming a better team." In my observation, Okafor has a better low post game than he is given credit for, and should have received more touches. Chandler only scored off put backs and alley-oops from Chris Paul.
Plus Okafor's yearly salary is about $1 million cheaper than Chandler - but his contract runs 3 years longer (5 years total left). So the Hornets get to add a 3rd banana behind Chris Paul and David West, potentially a good fit.
Still, their roster is an empty cupboard after those guys - the next best player is Julian Wright, who probably wouldn't crack the starting 5 of most of the West's elite teams. They have to fix that problem if they really want to compete.
I'm in agreement with John Hollinger's ESPN Insider article that by doing this trade "the Hornets pulled off the rare feat of saving money while becoming a better team." In my observation, Okafor has a better low post game than he is given credit for, and should have received more touches. Chandler only scored off put backs and alley-oops from Chris Paul.
ReplyDeletePlus Okafor's yearly salary is about $1 million cheaper than Chandler - but his contract runs 3 years longer (5 years total left). So the Hornets get to add a 3rd banana behind Chris Paul and David West, potentially a good fit.
Still, their roster is an empty cupboard after those guys - the next best player is Julian Wright, who probably wouldn't crack the starting 5 of most of the West's elite teams. They have to fix that problem if they really want to compete.