Better at basketball?

Who would be better at basketball? Tiger Woods, Michael Phelps, Roger Federer, or Rafael Nadal?

Consider that Phelps is 6'4", while the rest are 6'1". Federer and Nadal probably have greater speed and agility. You've never seen Tiger or Phelps run. On the other hand, there's a pretty good chance Tiger and Phelps have played before while Federer and Nadal may have never even touched a basketball.


  1. I would rank them: Phelps, Nadal, Federer, Tiger. Phelps has the height advantage (you can't teach height), and the agility. Tiger would be able to post like a fiend, though - dude is RIPPED.

  2. I think in a full court game, Federer and Nadal would run Tiger and Phelps off the court...I think Nadal could figure out how to dribble in the middle of the game, but Tiger isn't going to start improving his agility in the middle of the game.